### Our NESEA Zero Net Energy Building Award Submission

Click to view the presentation board (PDF, 5.4 MB)

We submitted our entry materials for the NESEA Zero Net Energy Building Award yesterday. We didn’t quite have a full year’s worth of data for last year’s competition. So we were excited to apply this year. You can find out more about the requirements for the competition on the NESEA site.

In putting together the data for the competition, I realized I needed to update a few items on our About page.

First, square footage. We had listed the house as 1408 sf. This is the outside dimension of the house (32*22) times two floors. Technically we should include the basement, which would bring the total to 2,112 sf. Total conditioned space remains the same at 1,200 sf.

Second, price per square foot. We had estimated \$142 per square foot. When we added up the final tally last year, I divided by the 1,408 number rather than the 2,112 number, so we ended up with an actual of \$208/sf. But when I went through all the numbers again I found a few extra expenses and realized I divided by the wrong number. So using the revised numbers, we end up with \$142/sf, strangely what we estimated originally. (In hindsight, that had to be total luck.)

That \$142/sf does not include significant site work. We didn’t pick a nice easy flat site next to the road to build our house. But if you built this house to similar specs on a nice flat lot near the road and didn’t have to drill your own well or install your own leach field, then this about what what you would pay if you did a lot of the design and labor yourself.

One last thing. The submission requirements included calculating the Energy Use Intensity (EUI). This is measured in kBTU per square foot per year. The fun part is converting kWh to kBTU. This is problematic for an Air Source Heat Pump, because the kWh required to create BTUs increase as the temperatures decrease. But as a general measure I suppose this is helpful. It might also be a trick question to check if the person submitting the entry knows what they are doing. Hmmm, hope I answered correctly.

Here’s how I determined our EUI. Our total energy use for the last 12 months was 6,898 kWh. To convert to BTUs we multiply kWh by 3412.14163312794 BTUs which gives us 23,536,952.9853165 BTUs. Divided by 1,000 to get kBTUs is 23,537 kBTUs. Now divide by square footage. It doesn’t specify whether this is conditioned space or total enclosed space, so I chose conditioned space. That gives us an EUI value of 19.6. If we use the larger enclosed space value then we get 11.1. The lower the value the better. Maybe I should have used the 11.1 value.

The winners are announced at the BuildingEnergy Conference in March. Wish us luck!

P.S. If you have built a net zero house in the larger New England area and have a year’s worth of energy data to prove you’re net zero, then apply soon. The deadline is December 15.  Good luck!

#### 4 Responses to “Our NESEA Zero Net Energy Building Award Submission”

1. 1 Jim Merrithew 3-December-2013 at 9:25 pm

Hello Larry and Jill,

Good luck with your submission. Thanks for another great explanation of how to do the math of energy conversion.

Jim

2. 2 Laura Moody 3-December-2014 at 10:30 am

Larry and Jill,
Great to see what you’re sharing and what you’ve accomplished through all your hard work and dedication/passion for a sustainable home and environment. Would love to have a visit to see your home/site. A question on putting a number on the work you did on the house relative to the square foot cost you’ve calculated. Are you able to value your contribution per sf to add to your total above in the terms or what it would have cost per sf if you’d contracted it out?
Laura Moody

• 4-December-2014 at 8:07 am

Hi Laura,

Thank you for your question. You are very welcome to visit. I’ll send you an email separately. I’ve thought a few times about how to put a number on our contribution. Pretty much every waking hour we weren’t working, was spent thinking or laboring on the house over a period of 20 months. But when you consider how much time we spent, I don’t think we saved a huge amount. Hiring an architect would have saved us countless hours of research. Hiring a GC with a full crew would have saved us at least 12 months of work. Skilled folks would have been able to do the work much faster. If we’d finished the house earlier we would have saved some money in interest on the construction loan. Going that route I’m guessing it might have cost us an additional \$40k to 50k. That would put us closer to \$160 to 165/sf. But that is just a guess. Hope that is helpful.

Larry